From: Yue Lu <hacklu.newborn@gmail.com>
To: Richard Braun <rbraun@sceen.net>
Cc: Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>,
gdb@sourceware.org, bug-hurd@gnu.org,
Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: how to continue from a breakpoint in GNU/Hurd
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 16:07:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAB8fV=hvso0fYxZwm11DTYaZeGrdaMG9nzE04G1G-TbR6wyDOw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130717120954.GA26158@dalaran.sceen.net>
Hi.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Richard Braun <rbraun@sceen.net> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 02:11:58PM +0800, Yue Lu wrote:
>> When I get the exception message, I set the EIP to the next instruction
>> (for instance 0x12345678), after resume it, I call get_thread_state(), and
>> found the EIP is still 0x12345678. The inferior never running anymore.
>
> I don't think it has anything to do with the instruction cache. Use the
> thread_info() call to determine what the suspend count is, it may have
> been incremented implicitely.
when I used thread_info() to check the suspend count, they are zero.
But I met a strange thing.
this is my code snippet:
thread_basic_info_data_t _info;
thread_basic_info_t info = &_info;
mach_msg_type_number_t info_len = THREAD_BASIC_INFO_COUNT;
error_t err =
thread_info (thread->port, THREAD_BASIC_INFO, (int *) &info, &info_len);
after this call, the info turn out to be a _NULL_ pointer. I think
something maybe wrong, but the err is zero.
In thread_takeover_sc_cmd() [gdb/gdb/gnu-nat.c] it has directly access
info after thread_info call, so I think this pointer never become a
NULL pointer, but in my code, it does. So I think something maybe
wrong, or this is a bug in gdb code.
--
Yue Lu (陆岳)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-17 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAB8fV=i04n-eHTxP=7hWRkB7O1VJobvrMc5KSHOX0SkJ3vuqhQ@mail.gmail.com>
2013-07-16 16:44 ` Luis Machado
2013-07-16 17:05 ` Yue Lu
2013-07-16 17:26 ` Luis Machado
[not found] ` <CAB8fV=jnOcYCGmQ_emcoE0ZYH6MjT3K3a1P8=svRR+nKSMD69A@mail.gmail.com>
2013-07-17 12:10 ` Richard Braun
2013-07-17 16:07 ` Yue Lu [this message]
2013-07-17 16:13 ` Richard Braun
2013-07-17 16:22 ` Yue Lu
2013-07-18 9:03 ` Richard Braun
2013-07-16 16:45 Yue Lu
2013-07-16 17:29 ` Hui Zhu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAB8fV=hvso0fYxZwm11DTYaZeGrdaMG9nzE04G1G-TbR6wyDOw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=hacklu.newborn@gmail.com \
--cc=bug-hurd@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=lgustavo@codesourcery.com \
--cc=rbraun@sceen.net \
--cc=thomas@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox