From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18217 invoked by alias); 18 Dec 2013 19:16:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 18207 invoked by uid 89); 18 Dec 2013 19:16:51 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-wg0-f46.google.com Received: from mail-wg0-f46.google.com (HELO mail-wg0-f46.google.com) (74.125.82.46) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 19:16:50 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id m15so84585wgh.13 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 11:16:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.207.239 with SMTP id lz15mr2120500wic.28.1387394206619; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 11:16:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.236.71 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 11:16:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52B1993F.9030105@tx.technion.ac.il> References: <52ADA077.7020406@tx.technion.ac.il> <52B1993F.9030105@tx.technion.ac.il> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 19:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [C++] System Requirements From: Ben Longbons To: Michael Veksler Cc: Andrew Pinski , GDB Development Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-SW-Source: 2013-12/txt/msg00055.txt.bz2 On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Michael Veksler wrote: > Nevertheless, supporting pre-gcc-3.4 compilers is still a pain. > Not only because language semantics is different (two-phase > name lookup in templates vs. one) but because you can't easily > build old compilers on modern machines. And if you don't test > your code with a pre-gcc-3.4 then your code won't work with > earlier compilers. Right. And my point is that not enough people use a pre-4.1 compiler either, even though 3.4 is *supposed* to mark the beginning of compliance. I'm definitely not happy about 4.1 - it would make gdb code significantly worse than it could be - but at least I can be confident that there is a userbase from RHEL 5. -Ben