From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 82449 invoked by alias); 26 Feb 2019 11:50:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 82140 invoked by uid 89); 26 Feb 2019 11:50:51 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=supplier, HX-Received:sk:g11mr22, H*c:alternative, customer X-HELO: mail-it1-f178.google.com Received: from mail-it1-f178.google.com (HELO mail-it1-f178.google.com) (209.85.166.178) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 11:50:50 +0000 Received: by mail-it1-f178.google.com with SMTP id m137so3421738ita.0 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 03:50:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=undo-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=eYUUmZ1OLLuvzCCYOh4ZP+byy5yV+q2ysR8sRdvKClY=; b=Ufqsj5XmzhVYx/M/XBgsUiOozzkzxUS5PRbBfFPyQDTri+Uj4IBdN9UG5LtbUhGb6u 9YbCgjcjgOaNyErR66WPzp7KnPmBwS6Nn0TZxLzlAMQD3qqpgyM8AtY4u6Z2AulECGN0 blHO/Rh42rPSxdvnwOwFKq+kmEU9NkIv5Um162sIy+Ou73HDFnNlkobWDEzGPRG9QK5y W13oVWHs0SBVDVk+dvGpDtPh43xFF864kJ7uqWF+fgKYWqE/+CXbMYD1/t4zOQ/NFXfz KTEjTM29dZfCBcgDIQtyb4SAauuIvfiz2o4rmyfSLAqBqHt6X/gAvKg1yyOynvXOwY0N WT3g== MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190226073236.GD10887@embecosm.com> <20190226101245.GA1496753@host1.jankratochvil.net> In-Reply-To: <20190226101245.GA1496753@host1.jankratochvil.net> From: David Griffiths Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 11:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is nexti confused by pushq? To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Andrew Burgess , dwk , GDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-02/txt/msg00066.txt.bz2 Ok, so in my case this is generated code with no debug info (Java JIT generated) so does that mean I shouldn't attempt to use nexti? (I've got other issues which probably preclude using nexti anyway but just curious) Cheers, David On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 at 10:12, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 08:32:37 +0100, Andrew Burgess wrote: > > Of course, this doesn't solve the problem for you, but at least you > > know what's going wrong now :) > > To make it clear the debuggee has wrong/insufficient debug info, its > .eh_frame/.debug_frame there should annotate the push (and pop) > instructions. > > > Jan > -- David Griffiths, Senior Software Engineer Undo | Resolve even the most challenging software defects with software flight recorder technology Software reliability report: optimizing the software supplier and customer relationship