From: Caz Yokoyama <cazyokoyama@gmail.com>
To: <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Cc: <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: RE: symbolic debug of loadable modules with kgdb light
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:28:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C061EF05AAC947979BBCCAE221D06834@xpjpn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <496730C3.1000302@web.de>
Hello,
Did you happen to try the former extension with the QEMU or KVM backend
already?
---
No. I am glad if you tell me how to do that. I saw a paper which talked
about running kgdb for guest OS of Xen.
(http://www.kernel.org/doc/ols/2006/ols2006v2-pages-9-24.pdf). I know there
is serial console in Virtual Machine Manager, i.e. select Guest OS ->
Details -> view -> serial console. But I have no idea how to connect it.
Is it possible to disable the SysRq interrupt for this use case?
----
I am not clear your point. My modification uses SysRq. I mean there are two
ways to generate SysRq, 1) from keyboard and 2) from serial port. 1) is
obvious, i.e. hit Ctrl+Alt+SysRq + g. 2) is BREAK and g. When my modified
gdb is invoked, it sends BREAK and g which break-in to kernel. Did I answer
your question? Or are you asking something else?
-caz
-----Original Message-----
From: jan.kiszka@web.de [mailto:jan.kiszka@web.de]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 3:11 AM
To: Caz Yokoyama
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: symbolic debug of loadable modules with kgdb light
Caz Yokoyama wrote:
> Hello,
> I started a sourceforge project called kgdb-light
> (http://sourceforge.net/projects/kgdb-light/). kgdb-light is a modified
gdb
> which handles symbol tables of loadable modules of Linux kernel 2.6.26 and
> later. Linux kernel 2.6.26 and later integrates kernel debugging under
> kernel hacking. Gdb handles symbol table of Linux kernel, but it does not
> for loadable modules. Kgdb-light updates internal symbol table by reading
> "struct module" in kernel. I also modified gdb to send Magic SysRq,
> therefore, target may locate far away.
>
Sounds very interesting. Did you happend to try the former extension
with the QEMU or KVM backend already? Would be _very_ cool if such
support became mainline (I'm tired of add-symbol-file with manually
looked-up module addresses...). Is it possible to disable the SysRq
interrupt for this use case? [ I still consider this variation of the
original remote protocol an unfortunate decision of the kernel
developers, but back then I wasn't able to convince them to change it. ]
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-09 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-08 14:09 Caz Yokoyama
2009-01-08 19:04 ` Tiago Maluta
2009-01-08 19:40 ` Caz Yokoyama
2009-01-08 19:42 ` Caz Yokoyama
2009-01-09 4:18 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-01-09 14:52 ` Caz Yokoyama
2009-01-09 18:17 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-01-09 19:33 ` Caz Yokoyama
2009-01-10 6:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
[not found] ` <B28296C4454C4B539564033161523A12@xpjpn>
2009-01-11 3:38 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-01-09 11:11 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-01-09 11:28 ` Caz Yokoyama [this message]
2009-01-09 12:38 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-01-09 16:29 ` Caz Yokoyama
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C061EF05AAC947979BBCCAE221D06834@xpjpn \
--to=cazyokoyama@gmail.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox