Re: [discuss] Support for reverse-execution

Michael Snyder
2005-05-20T20:38:17Z

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> I would just have called the command rcontinue, but reverse-continue is
> fine with me too; either way we'll hopefully offer abbreviations, like
> "c" and "si".

I can't remember if I said this already, but...

If you look at gcore.c, you'll see that the actual name of the command
is "generate-core-file". Then it's aliased to the shorter "gcore".

That's what I had in mind here. A long-but-descriptive form
(which perhaps no one will ever type), and one or more short
forms such as rcontinue and rc.