Re: [discuss] Support for reverse-execution

Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-21T14:23:24Z

On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 10:13:04AM -0400, Paul Schlie wrote:
> > When someone implements reversible debugging in a free simulator and
> > wants to integrate that with GDB, they'll have the choice of doing the
> > remaining steps in their simulator or in GDB.
>
> - Although our views may differ, I accept and support the simple reality
> that those to invest the time and resources in a development, have the
> greatest say in the decisions. (In this case if the desire is to define
> an interface for a single lone proprietary tool, likely in satisfaction or
> natural result of a commercial commercial contract to do so, then let it
> be; but attempting to justify it as a good thing is a bit of a stretch).

Paul, I have said repeatedly in this discussion that I think this is a
natural, valid, good interface to the functionality. That's my
considered opinion; I am not trying to justify anything by it.

Please take a deep breath and stop tossing accusation around if you
want to be taken seriously.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC