From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7624 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2007 11:26:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 7614 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Apr 2007 11:26:49 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from bay0-omc2-s32.bay0.hotmail.com (HELO bay0-omc2-s32.bay0.hotmail.com) (65.54.246.168) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:26:47 +0100 Received: from hotmail.com ([65.55.155.92]) by bay0-omc2-s32.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Mon, 16 Apr 2007 04:26:45 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 04:26:45 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 65.55.155.123 by by144fd.bay144.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:26:42 GMT X-Sender: kal_pana@hotmail.com In-Reply-To: From: "Kalpana Ramamurthy" To: gdb@sourceware.org Cc: kal_pana@hotmail.com Bcc: Subject: Why does gdb print a complete stack trace even after switching to other frames ? Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:26:00 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-04/txt/msg00103.txt.bz2 Hello, Even after switching frames using "frame ", the backtrace prints a complete backtrace from 0 to the oldest frame. Shouldn't the backtrace be from the switched frame to the oldest frames instead of from the 0'th frame ? For example, if I switch to frame 3, bt should print from frame 3 to the oldest frame and not from frame 0 to oldest frame. Why does gdb show this behaviour of printing the complete stack trace irrespective of which frame we are switching on ? Kalpana === _________________________________________________________________ Free & easy posting . Yello Classifieds. http://www.yello.in/home.php?utm_source=hotmailtag&utm_medium=textlink&utm_content=in&utm_campaign=april