From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-39007-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 31788 invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2011 13:33:32 -0000
Received: (qmail 31780 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Apr 2011 13:33:31 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-vw0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-vw0-f41.google.com) (209.85.212.41)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 13:33:22 +0000
Received: by vws4 with SMTP id 4so609089vws.0        for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 06:33:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.112.69 with SMTP id io5mr737281vdb.94.1302701601221; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 06:33:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.175.197 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 06:33:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikpEhjP-RPyLFcwoF=nC3K+oas-ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTikpEhjP-RPyLFcwoF=nC3K+oas-ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kevin Pouget <kevin.pouget@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 13:33:00 -0000
Message-ID: <BANLkTin1PTQ5vuO5h+eoAzkRgym0HCfCmw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Follow-fork-mode and inferiors
To: gdb@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg00041.txt.bz2

Hello,

I noticed a behavior which appears strange to me, I would like to know
if it was expected:

> (gdb) list
> 1=A0=A0=A0 int main() {
> 2=A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 fork() ;
> 3=A0=A0=A0 }
>
> (gdb) break 3
> (gdb) set follow-fork-mode child
> (gdb) run
> ...
> Breakpoint 1, main () at fork.c:3
> 3=A0=A0=A0 }
> (gdb) info inferiors
> =A0 Num=A0 Description=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Executable
> * 2=A0=A0=A0 process 26039=A0=A0=A0=A0 /home/kevin/travail/arm/perso/root=
/sample/fork-threads/fork
> =A0 1=A0=A0=A0 <null>=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 /home/kevin/travai=
l/arm/perso/root/sample/fork-threads/fork

why are there two inferiors? I expected either to stay in inf 1 (if
the pid of an inferior can change) or inf 1 to disappear, but not to
keep both of them!

thanks,

Kevin