From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-39285-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 14205 invoked by alias); 1 Jun 2011 19:05:35 -0000
Received: (qmail 14194 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jun 2011 19:05:34 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-fx0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-fx0-f41.google.com) (209.85.161.41)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 19:05:15 +0000
Received: by fxm18 with SMTP id 18so343267fxm.0        for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 12:05:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.53.84 with SMTP id l20mr1285513fag.48.1306955114083; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 12:05:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.107.3 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 12:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinXFt_Q+nJtnGu8=+REe6w5pUMagA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTi=rs+62oeC3X5qV_C=HCRYrSTQpZg@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTimO18hnvOGpbtEHUTUo0Nbpq0yxXg@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTinXFt_Q+nJtnGu8=+REe6w5pUMagA@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0ciBIbHV6w61u?= <petr.hluzin@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 19:05:00 -0000
Message-ID: <BANLkTimeBBYsD+Sg1SBgYozN72XTR-fLGA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Addition of a special memory reading command
To: Tomas Martinec <fyzmat@gmail.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00004.txt.bz2

On 1 June 2011 18:35, Tomas Martinec <fyzmat@gmail.com> wrote:
> The cli form of the "info proc mappings" command is not very suitable
> for the frontend. Maybe creating an MI equivalent to the "info proc
> mappings" would be nice. The MI form also enables me to specify the
> thread. That is needed in my VM scenario, because I represent
> processors as threads and each processor can be in different
> addressing mode.

Are you aware GDB remote protocol can debug multiple processes at the same time?
Separate processes may be more appropriate if the addressing modes are
very different - which I do not know.

>
> Would you accept this improvement?

Someone else has to answer this. I am just a regular observer here,
not a developer or a maintainer.

-- 
Petr Hluzin