From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-38401-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 23764 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2010 16:13:19 -0000
Received: (qmail 23747 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Dec 2010 16:13:17 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (194.98.77.210)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:13:09 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D42CB01E2;	Tue,  7 Dec 2010 17:13:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1])	by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)	with ESMTP id AzfyxGFBBpyZ; Tue,  7 Dec 2010 17:13:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ulanbator.act-europe.fr (ulanbator.act-europe.fr [10.10.1.67])	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))	(No client certificate requested)	by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70AA6CB01E0;	Tue,  7 Dec 2010 17:13:07 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: Using telnet to control a running GDB
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com>
In-Reply-To: <m3mxoh8tu2.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:13:00 -0000
Cc: Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com>, "'Jan Kratochvil'" <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>, "'gdb\@sourceware.org'" <gdb@sourceware.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B60FE65D-FB5D-47BE-8662-CC77E975D85A@adacore.com>
References: <F7CE05678329534C957159168FA70DEC572E0C0DCD@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>	<20101129025627.GA4356@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>	<F7CE05678329534C957159168FA70DEC572E79C43E@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>	<20101129185524.GA13721@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>	<F7CE05678329534C957159168FA70DEC572E79C924@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>	<m362v6da0o.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<F7CE05678329534C957159168FA70DEC572E0C0DE9@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se> <m3mxoh8tu2.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-12/txt/msg00022.txt.bz2


On Dec 7, 2010, at 4:51 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
> TBH I think it would be better if we could remove some modes.  For
> example, if we could make target-async either the default, or enabled
> automatically if the user uses some async command.

Just keep in mind that a lot of probes only implement the minimal set of co=
mmands.  So if we remove some modes (which I think is a good idea), we need=
 to keep the veteran sync/all-stop mode.

Tristan.