From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-36610-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 7860 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2010 09:24:02 -0000
Received: (qmail 7845 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jan 2010 09:24:01 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (212.99.106.210)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 09:23:56 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 	by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD4B1CB0251; 	Fri,  8 Jan 2010 10:23:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) 	by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) 	with ESMTP id qgI7XABhy1IK; Fri,  8 Jan 2010 10:23:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ulanbator.act-europe.fr (ulanbator.act-europe.fr [10.10.1.67]) 	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) 	(No client certificate requested) 	by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF49CB01D7; 	Fri,  8 Jan 2010 10:23:53 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: GDB 7.1 release planning...
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100108042117.GK4623@adacore.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 09:24:00 -0000
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B0E22CC9-9C19-479E-8720-E03F598FB15B@adacore.com>
References: <20100108042117.GK4623@adacore.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00053.txt.bz2


On Jan 8, 2010, at 5:21 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote:

> Anything that would be highly desirable and would potentially
> justify delaying the branch?

I'd like to improve the behaviour on Darwin.  Most of the work has already =
been integrated and I think the
last submitted patch would go in before the dead-line.
The last known issue is proper handling of common symbols, but this work is=
 not yet ready.  I will see
if I can submit this before Jan 15th.

Tristan.