From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22276 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2011 17:19:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 22267 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Mar 2011 17:19:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-gw0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-gw0-f41.google.com) (74.125.83.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 17:19:16 +0000 Received: by gwaa12 with SMTP id a12so3778295gwa.0 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 10:19:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.108.16 with SMTP id k16mr3925269anm.64.1300814354767; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 10:19:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.232.12 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 10:19:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110322154327.GA8966@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <20110322154327.GA8966@host1.jankratochvil.net> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 17:19:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: readline rebase 5.1->6.2? From: Kai Tietz To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, Kai Tietz , Eli Zaretskii , Christopher Faylor Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00123.txt.bz2 2011/3/22 Jan Kratochvil : > Just the patches are of the kind of MS-related platforms compatibility: > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0+dnl BEGIN changes for CYGNUS cross-building for Cygwin > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0+#ifdef __MSDOS__ > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0+#if defined (__GO32__) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0+#ifndef __MINGW32__ > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0!+#if defined (SIGWINCH) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0? (+#if defined (HAVE_GETPWENT)) > > Other patches are for rl_prompt and signals where there were enough upstr= eam > readline modifications I do not think these patches are meaningfully > applicable anymore. > > Unfortunately there is AFAIK usually (in some cases there is) no testcase= of > readline. > > Before 7.3 cut off I ask about the opinion on these MS-related platforms > compatibility readline patches, Fedora GNU/Linux runs fine with > readline-6.1-2.fc14 with readline-6.2-2.fc15 soon to be GA and also no > reported problems. Well, I would also expect that in general those patches aren't meaningfully applicable anymore. But I think this upgrade should wait until 7.3 is escaped. > > Thanks, > Jan > Kai