From: "karthikeyan.s" <informkarthik@gmail.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Matthew Gretton-Dann <Matthew.Gretton-Dann@arm.com>, gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [HELP]Can GDB for ARM set hard breakpoint when native debugging?
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:00:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikaZ24yzYD_Mjw3et-dcPSp4WCf5wiZC_DWondF@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <-2775908164685299161@unknownmsgid>
Thanks. Unfortunately, we are not working on 2.6.35. Shortly (I don't
know how soon) we will. I can try this patch only then. I did go
through the patch though.
Regarding the issue I had earlier, it is a NULL pointer dereference at
__sigqueue_alloc
at.
user = get_uid(__task_cred(t)->user);
Seems to be related to the perf event patch I took from arm linux for
your patch.
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> H Karthik,
>
>> Did you have issue any issues(kernel crash) with the watch_thread_num
>> test gdb test (testsuite) with your gdb changes (And offcourse with
>> you kernel backend!)? ( watch_thread_num is in
>> gdb/testsuite/gdb.base). The issue is not just with watchpoints but
>> also breakpoints. I am using a 2.6.33 kernel for which you had posted
>> the patch version2.
>
> Since you're trying to use this stuff, I've just submitted a new version
> of the patchset:
>
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-June/017680.html
>
> Please see if the issue occurs with the new code. Unfortunately, I've not
> had a chance to test it because the ptrace interface has changed and I
> don't have a GDB that can `talk the talk'.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Will
>
>
>
--
---
S. Karthikeyan | +919980814745
---
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-13 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-01 15:06 karthikeyan.s
2010-06-01 15:18 ` Matthew Gretton-Dann
2010-06-03 11:39 ` karthikeyan.s
2010-06-03 11:54 ` Will Deacon
[not found] ` <-3629479195726626766@unknownmsgid>
2010-06-10 14:40 ` karthikeyan.s
2010-06-10 15:03 ` Will Deacon
[not found] ` <-2775908164685299161@unknownmsgid>
2010-06-13 13:00 ` karthikeyan.s [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-05-28 6:00 xingxing pan
2010-05-28 6:22 ` xingxing pan
2010-05-28 9:28 ` Matthew Gretton-Dann
[not found] ` <113ACA888B71994BB56E5CF3704953486BAA6A18D8@BGMAIL02.nvidia.com>
2010-06-01 9:06 ` Will Deacon
2010-05-28 11:20 ` Simon Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTikaZ24yzYD_Mjw3et-dcPSp4WCf5wiZC_DWondF@mail.gmail.com \
--to=informkarthik@gmail.com \
--cc=Matthew.Gretton-Dann@arm.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox