From: "Thomas,Stephen" <stephen.thomas@superh.com>
To: <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Cc: "Bowers, Antony" <antony.bowers@superh.com>,
"McGoogan,Sean" <sean.mcgoogan@superh.com>
Subject: Dummy Breakpoint Priority
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 12:00:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9FF3133289A7A84E81E2ED8F5E56B379604398@sh-uk-ex01.uk.w2k.superh.com> (raw)
Hi,
I am currently porting gdb to the new SuperH SH5 architecture. I have just hit a problem, which sounds exactly the same as that reported on 31 Aug 2001 (by Jiri Smid, titled 'Dummy Breakpoint Priority').
When a target function is called from the command line, a special dummy breakpoint is inserted at the program entry point. (We have CALL_DUMMY_LOCATION defined as AT_ENTRY_POINT). Trouble is, when the program is statically linked, gdb has already placed an internal breakpoint at _start, of type bp_shlib_event. On return from the function, this causes bpstat_what() in breakpoint.c to return an action which causes gdb to carry on executing (what.main_action = BPSTAT_WHAT_CHECK_SHLIBS).
The reply to Jiri Smid's mail asked why solib-svr4.c was setting a bp on the entry point. But it looks like this is the normal thing for gdb to do - I verified that x86 gdb does the same thing (it doesn't suffer from this problem though because it doesn't use AT_ENTRY_POINT).
So please can anyone tell me what the resolution of this problem was?
NB: Please reply using 'Reply All' as I am leaving SuperH shortly...
Thanks,
Steve Thomas
SuperH (UK) Ltd.
next reply other threads:[~2003-06-26 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-26 12:00 Thomas,Stephen [this message]
2003-06-26 17:47 ` Andrew Cagney
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-06-27 9:24 Thomas,Stephen
2001-08-31 3:49 dummy breakpoint priority Jiri Smid
2001-08-31 8:42 ` Kevin Buettner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9FF3133289A7A84E81E2ED8F5E56B379604398@sh-uk-ex01.uk.w2k.superh.com \
--to=stephen.thomas@superh.com \
--cc=antony.bowers@superh.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=sean.mcgoogan@superh.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox