From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id EuUkNlOQ22idfxkAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 04:09:55 -0400 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=DBke4aIY; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id C93441E047; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 04:09:55 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 312411E047 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 04:09:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B92603858C30 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 08:09:54 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B92603858C30 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1759219794; bh=7tHCTAqam7yM3rvER6fqUbcej4AFE09YjLMu1Iag6rU=; h=Subject:Date:References:Cc:In-Reply-To:To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=DBke4aIYzKQ/28RMvIULM29sdAi6j5TuxiWW99doY3t4U+iQImxkWHiGsdBdwWUba tVwj0dQ8vNe/DhO55DUgYyDbKx0IeXUtfClBysMiTh7AEibRHZGhCrHtGBpCyJxJrz d1jhdN1VvI2Qc5bw941OVSTrKt27FFXV910W7zgE= Received: from mail-ej1-x631.google.com (mail-ej1-x631.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::631]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11BFC3858D20 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 08:09:03 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 11BFC3858D20 ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 11BFC3858D20 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1759219743; cv=none; b=DViP0cf7+9rPQc8OSWoFgEDqQe0an2WajZZ8X6Ogn13eePJRs2dzFpWASE5WBKSVIaxjGbOCk68XxI4EfjhsnPsjuZ3dgJ9PsW9KInuxwHbWJpCZlRhTEzA56oX0hiX4FZ1UKSc861dv+RnU4WfOMGHV44O8HuBrVbLMlxiNK1I= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1759219743; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pvgJgVG3kMfzhG5+OgFrACtP+yD7Nbdnrd/A6rsS5dg=; h=DKIM-Signature:From:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:Message-Id:To; b=Aw+cdjM5VDvogUrt47tDUoqdnK/NRrTuW5Xpg8oCPyGMxzqvzyZqcE4VvR557rF6CHj9tUcss6t6y+XoiEIEzCWED5C9XMx2kbDjqmjUS174VINaKYHx4HrKhImrXcTD2SjHwJJqqW6LWta9SLSkKKwf5eKPeCd/kzs/7mu7NVQ= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 11BFC3858D20 Received: by mail-ej1-x631.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-b2e173b8364so849090766b.1 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 01:09:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1759219741; x=1759824541; h=to:in-reply-to:cc:references:message-id:date:subject:mime-version :from:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7tHCTAqam7yM3rvER6fqUbcej4AFE09YjLMu1Iag6rU=; b=VyUh1KZyQcaC188+R38YNkpL5jSerbYmWGQVOWwNkEWFmesrz2Pd+rpFygVkjeIdeh DO4wfc8dCwOpnrjnBwE/KgoqTPCfQixZ9K/ahYaIep9l3HxCV5DBpds9WLNWd9aE767f 3ISmcVNZDXcd2x7rAVAYX5iiBsTfY1/ss/tbU5e7cqDD6n1GEf90VDmFty9s0O9eQzmU oqBfTM536IzDkqJcO7t/9NBVpl9YQSH7WlsBxyWYIEFh6ZqINqxNFsNlz+faICT5M4TY ei64IqdN5jJe7+vZUkCDlKUZRZdzUhWxKy/ukHewK8fHpma88oDA/hpzlUcPTDfy9gqT 7Ggg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUk+pfU2dCP3TauHcGnaY6hF2GUw5nV9TL6fTJqfzV49nTA50/FalrQAEp/mTQQTcvKciM=@sourceware.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxb8buyq/0gDShERIMRYqqMG9gV2eY1XIThdTlBp6GZJkBiMGHD 3X4c5GQL0NRO5S2s5SPv6Lqxj+FGBs8MbwBndSWL4g95eHhxHZ3gWbWG X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctKQCnQe/TW83yxiUzfZutMg0asc03WstZvTXdCarB2bKhN+0czpJqptmkSnd4 SKsLW3E3Gk5LfAzTP2+G8Py8MWCSbS/kIjbskAHrdW+Anp9NulJ2jGdW1rtynSONIsQS9dsi9t6 U+Thz0H94sUp4pJzsSEYKDrtn87sbSVFtVjvckqMt21g0ggL3ITt/V/2OOu+6aSypI8Z/iwVE/M bX/mWlZNU40sEwBet/LlNZlRqd3NIemwnS4aSfKbhndohLLocOV7CMmIouqfEz34J1ATV1m5z+P 95IUtnU/kEK5GDNP1UoIDjBScY+W8yh+lkZXurB1I0TydoyU8kqSqMH7afT/BbgfMNbAO/nlxt7 RLYsJEEddGAIBkhruGCiZxKw6VJWGugdeRyhCeBV6fBznYSIs/pouEdxJ53PfKUj7p8sdRM6gu5 47n6dwxLnFcfq7YsedRKjIgXWlpsW3L74rM3vgVy6Tco6WuJE7yPWv9vgoy1zGTStJ X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEMdlGcNq6qLLCJ5tZCkEHZmZ0bJt9cF770cvfyxBYw1Q6Lx/7Lzrig+Ymu/4oRvuCW43gWPQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7f90:b0:b0d:d831:6fba with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-b34bfa53227mr2165901366b.59.1759219741298; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 01:09:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpclient.apple (dynamic-095-114-110-133.95.114.pool.telefonica.de. [95.114.110.133]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-b353efb88ebsm1093133366b.32.2025.09.30.01.09.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 30 Sep 2025 01:09:00 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: bugzilla keyword for beginner issues to work on Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 10:08:49 +0200 Message-Id: <9F10F8B2-8121-4B7C-8047-82EC16F2853E@gmail.com> References: Cc: Andrew Pinski , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org, guinevere@redhat.com In-Reply-To: To: Luis X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (22H31) X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Richard Biener via Gdb Reply-To: Richard Biener Errors-To: gdb-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" > Am 30.09.2025 um 08:27 schrieb Luis via Gcc : >=20 > =EF=BB=BFOn 29/09/2025 21:07, Andrew Pinski wrote: >> Hi all, >> As talked about during the GNU tools cauldron, the gdb and gcc >> keywords usage here are different but folks mentioned it would be a >> good idea to have the same between the 2 bugzilla instances. Right now >> gcc is easyhack while gdb uses good-first-bug. Both have issues with >> the naming of each. >> So I was thinking of a good name and came up with beginner-improvement . >> I know this is all bikeshedding but in this case since the 2 projects >> right now use different naming we have a good chance to come up with a >> good name in the first place. >> beginner-improvement has a few advantages, first it is about being a >> beginner to the project. How long someone can be a beginner is up to >> them; it does not need to be their first issue solving. And the idea >> of an issue being easy is also left behind; some of them might not >> actually be "easy" but a beginner can still solve it. >> Plus in many cases it is not exactly a bug but rather than an >> improvement that needs to be done so this new name removes that side >> of things. >> So in summary, beginner-improvement is my proposal for the new keyword. >> Thanks, >> Andrew Pinski >=20 > Personally I'm fine with beginner-improvement. Would we need to go hunting= for the old names to do the mass updates? I think it=E2=80=99s possible to rename keywords? Richard=20=