From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23846 invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2003 16:27:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23773 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2003 16:26:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailhub.lss.emc.com) (168.159.2.8) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Jun 2003 16:26:59 -0000 Received: from mxic1.corp.emc.com (mxic1.isus.emc.com [168.159.129.100]) by mailhub.lss.emc.com (Switch-2.2.5/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id h5IGQsD12460; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 12:26:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mxic1.corp.emc.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 12:26:45 -0400 Message-ID: <93F527C91A6ED411AFE10050040665D0083FA5A6@corpusmx1.us.dg.com> From: Mathews_Alex@emc.com To: drow@mvista.com, Mathews_Alex@emc.com Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: RE: Breakpoint on class member function Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 16:27:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00384.txt.bz2 The ptype output is the same before and after, and it does list all the members. I'll try to debug the lookup routines. Thanks for your assistance. -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Jacobowitz [mailto:drow@mvista.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 12:07 PM To: Mathews_Alex@emc.com Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Breakpoint on class member function Well, if I can't get a test case I'm not sure how much help I can be. Let's see... Is "ptype foo" correct both before and after the "target remote"? Does it list foo1 as a member? If both are yes, you're going to have to debug the lookup routines yourself to see where the problem is. On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 11:36:49AM -0400, Mathews_Alex@emc.com wrote: > I have tried with a gdb 5.3 without my changes and see the same problem. > When I do the configure I use target==i686-pc-linux if that's of any > significance. I'm working with a proprietary OS, so I don't have a binary > to distribute. > > Doing "b foo::foo1; delete 1; b foo::foo1" without the target remote does > work. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Jacobowitz [mailto:drow@mvista.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 11:06 AM > To: Mathews_Alex@emc.com > Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com > Subject: Re: Breakpoint on class member function > > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 10:50:29AM -0400, Mathews_Alex@emc.com wrote: > > > > I'm working with an internally modified gdb 5.3. I'm trying to figure out > > if something happens with symbols after a target remote is issued. The > > binary is ELF format with debugging information built with gcc 3.2. The > > scenario that I'm seeing is the following: > > > > (gdb) file symbols.gdb > > (gdb) b foo::foo1 > > Breakpoint 1 @ ... > > (gdb) delete 1 > > (gdb) target remote /dev/ttyS1 > > (gdb) b foo::foo1 > > the class foo does not have any method named foo1 > > Hint: try 'foo::foo1 or 'foo::foo1 > > (gdb) b 'foo::foo1(char *, char *)' > > Breakpoint 2 @ ... > > > > So, before I do a target remote, I'm able to set a breakpoint without the > > fully typed member function. Then afterwards, it won't work unless it's > > fully typed, so I'm forced to use the hint provided. I haven't modified > > anything in the symbol area, but I have made modifications to target > remote > > related code. > > > > Any insight would be appreciated. I did see bug 1023, but I wasn't sure > if > > that applied in my case. > > This doesn't make any sense to me. Do you have any distributable > binaries which reproduce the problem - and can you reproduce it without > your local changes? > > Does "b foo::foo1; delete 1; b foo::foo1" work without the target > remote? > > -- > Daniel Jacobowitz > MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer > -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer