Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luis Machado <luis.machado@linaro.org>
To: 刘康 <lkang0305@163.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: gdbserver for arm does not support multi-process debugging
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 10:38:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <934889b6-c654-76ab-a4ca-48b515e24859@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3cb2ee7c.59f4.16dfc404ae2.Coremail.lkang0305@163.com>

Hi,

I just ran a quick check (foll-fork.exp and follow-vfork.exp tests) on a 
arm machine and things worked as expected.

What version of GDB/kernel are you using?

On 10/24/19 2:32 AM, 刘康 wrote:
> Hi Luis,
> 
> Yes, I know that gdbserver willcatch PTRACE_EVENT_FORK in 
> gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c:handle_extended_wait and get the child 
> process's pid via PTRACE_GETEVENTMSG.
> 
> I found the way of X86 version gdb to deal with PTRACE_EVENT_FORKwill 
> set waitstatus toTARGET_WAITKIND_FORKED and add a new inferior .What's 
> more ,it can trace child/parent process automatically as long as I set 
> "follow-fork-mode" to "child" or "parent".
> 
> But it seems like gdbserver will not tell PTRACE_EVENT_FORK to thehost 
> arm-XXX-gdb this event ,as a result , user cannot trace child process or 
> add a new inferior no matter what value of "detach-on-fork off" and 
> "follow-fork-mode" I have tried.
> 
> At 2019-10-18 20:27:19, "Luis Machado" <luis.machado@linaro.org> wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>On 10/17/19 3:19 AM, 刘康 wrote:
>>> Dear gdb@sourceware.org
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I am researching the gdbserver's source code for ARM, what confused me is that it does not support multi-process to debug the target's child process, cause it dose not interesting in PTRACE_EVENT_FORK, I don't know whether it's a bug or it's just a feature by design.
>>
>>The handling of PTRACE_EVENT_FORK, PTRACE_EVENT_VFORK and 
>>PTRACE_EVENT_CLONE is in generic linux code. See 
>>gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c:handle_extended_wait.
>>
>>As long as the kernel supports reporting such events via ptrace and we 
>>are debugging using extended remote mode (not regular remote mode), it 
>>should work. If it doesn't, then we may have a problem that we should fix.
>>
>>Does that answer your question?
>>
>>Luis
> 
> 
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-24 10:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-17  6:19 刘康
2019-10-18 12:27 ` Luis Machado
     [not found]   ` <3cb2ee7c.59f4.16dfc404ae2.Coremail.lkang0305@163.com>
2019-10-24 10:38     ` Luis Machado [this message]
2019-10-28 11:13       ` 刘康
     [not found]         ` <1eb012d5-2fad-bd49-e5c9-6160bbfc1c0d@linaro.org>
     [not found]           ` <57533fd3.e9a7.16e171c601e.Coremail.lkang0305@163.com>
     [not found]             ` <d0d526d6-159f-5e42-8ff8-efbac3649631@linaro.org>
     [not found]               ` <76c18800.41ee.16e1a553723.Coremail.lkang0305@163.com>
2019-10-30  1:46                 ` Luis Machado

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=934889b6-c654-76ab-a4ca-48b515e24859@linaro.org \
    --to=luis.machado@linaro.org \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    --cc=lkang0305@163.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox