From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9464 invoked by alias); 22 Sep 2009 13:30:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 9430 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Sep 2009 13:30:09 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp2.ugent.be (HELO smtp2.UGent.be) (157.193.49.126) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:30:02 +0000 Received: from localhost (mcheck2.ugent.be [157.193.49.249]) by smtp2.UGent.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9E41449F9A; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:29:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2.UGent.be ([157.193.49.126]) by localhost (mcheck2.ugent.be [157.193.43.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SrUNirOAFWtO; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:29:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.elis.ugent.be (mail.elis.UGent.be [157.193.206.48]) by smtp2.UGent.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9220B449FBF; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:29:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.elis.ugent.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED25918F1E; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:29:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.elis.ugent.be ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.elis.ugent.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3i4R7dVl2p91; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:29:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from bigmac.elis.UGent.be (bigmac.elis.UGent.be [157.193.206.33]) by mail.elis.ugent.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B3A918F1B; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:29:51 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Jim Ingham , gdb@sourceware.org Message-Id: <92D837F2-68E5-45E8-AB54-F133E7DB2CCA@elis.ugent.be> From: Jonas Maebe To: Mark Wielaard In-Reply-To: <1253624335.20668.32.camel@springer.wildebeest.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] GDB 7.0 release process created Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:30:00 -0000 References: <20090920143231.GQ7961@adacore.com> <8ac60eac0909200802m45f2675epa6e56001af4b491@mail.gmail.com> <20090920152741.GR7961@adacore.com> <8ac60eac0909200914g39a2d471j601aebd995da1d02@mail.gmail.com> <20090920171154.GT7961@adacore.com> <20090920173607.GA18628@bromo.med.uc.edu> <8ac60eac0909201137h3b357f95hc9471ed186575c06@mail.gmail.com> <20090921043410.GA25454@adacore.com> <20090921125654.GA30075@bromo.med.uc.edu> <3D48AF75-6E1F-401C-8411-8388B7D893B9@elis.ugent.be> <20090921134617.GA30967@bromo.med.uc.edu> <187A0C0A-28B7-4A51-BE99-47C0F650C1F8@apple.com> <1253624335.20668.32.camel@springer.wildebeest.org> X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 4AB8D152.006/157.193.206.48/mail.elis.UGent.be/mail.elis.ugent.be/ X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 4AB8D152.006 on smtp2.UGent.be : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000 X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00287.txt.bz2 On 22 Sep 2009, at 14:58, Mark Wielaard wrote: > If the gdb binary as conveyed to the user depends on being > codesigned by > a particular authorization key, then that should be part of the > corresponding source code that the user receives. So then the signing > authorization keys would be available for any rebuild gdb binary that > the user creates. Isn't that only as of GPLv3 and later? (the whole "Installation Information" discussion) Apple's gdb is based on an old (GPLv2) fork. Jonas