From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-46439-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 35128 invoked by alias); 2 May 2018 10:13:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 34828 invoked by uid 89); 2 May 2018 10:13:27 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 May 2018 10:13:26 +0000
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.6])	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))	(No client certificate requested)	by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAFA476FBA;	Wed,  2 May 2018 10:13:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.4])	by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 527B0215CDA7;	Wed,  2 May 2018 10:13:24 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: GDB 8.1 build error
To: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
References: <214C80CC-1173-41F6-AAA1-39C9D39E28B2@comcast.net> <454707570722fc0220074c0eca015a8f@polymtl.ca> <D029885B-D093-4416-9957-371E3D08495E@comcast.net> <c744d369-801b-c29f-dd3d-961c57ebec74@redhat.com> <e687057d79e17944e9a77912fd22bac0@polymtl.ca> <6171a043-e486-85ec-bdbb-2077a2b5ebd0@redhat.com> <b02d45ab46b5a572724bccbbb5eed7d4@polymtl.ca> <9ed9617b-987e-3225-8518-a43eda0b5548@redhat.com> <13bcba4a8a70bcd977a7e644dd59e4bf@polymtl.ca> <a28595b3-ed78-2a6b-36c9-48965efa87f9@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul Koning <paulkoning@comcast.net>, gdb@sourceware.org
From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <927fb991-56bd-368c-6056-fc4c06002db4@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2018 10:13:00 -0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a28595b3-ed78-2a6b-36c9-48965efa87f9@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2018-05/txt/msg00003.txt.bz2

On 05/02/2018 10:41 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:

> So seems like we could handle this my making --disable-build-warnings
> use "-Wno-error -w" instead of just "-w".  But I'd suggest checking with
> clang and/or gcc folks to confirm the difference is intentional too.

A gcc maintainer told me that gcc has behaved like this since forever.
So it could be that the difference in clang may be unintentional.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves