From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27948 invoked by alias); 24 Oct 2010 07:24:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 27938 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Oct 2010 07:24:51 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nm2-vm0.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (HELO nm2-vm0.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com) (98.138.91.39) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 07:24:46 +0000 Received: from [98.138.90.48] by nm2.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Oct 2010 05:06:23 -0000 Received: from [98.138.89.164] by tm1.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Oct 2010 05:06:23 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1020.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Oct 2010 05:06:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 36651 invoked by uid 60001); 24 Oct 2010 05:06:22 -0000 Message-ID: <904677.30619.qm@web112502.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Received: from [123.237.140.102] by web112502.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 22:06:22 PDT References: <47709.51319.qm@web112517.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4CC33CA2.90002@vmware.com> <4CC33F46.3080104@vmware.com> Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 07:24:00 -0000 From: paawan oza Subject: Re: ChangeLog info missing ? To: Michael Snyder Cc: "gdb@sourceware.org" In-Reply-To: <4CC33F46.3080104@vmware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-10/txt/msg00101.txt.bz2 Hi Michael, 1) sorry for not noticing challog 2009. : ( but I am confused with outer Changelog because, if you see patch mentioned in below mail, which if checked in, will go to '/Changelog' in the root directory itself, where I find the entry 2009-08-19 Ralf Wildenhues * configure.ac: Call AC_DISABLE_OPTION_CHECKING. but, the patch entry missing, looks like the patch is not applied so in conclusion, appropriately correcting my understanding, each directory has changelog and changelog file is only applicable to be modified if developer has modified contents of that directory. Outer Changelog is never affected. right ? 2) Ok, I think I need to go thorugh arm-tdep.c, as I saw there has been lots of changes done in 2010, but was not sure exactly for what, as there are some huge changes, If I have any questions after going through, I will try to post them. Regards, Oza. ----- Original Message ---- From: Michael Snyder To: paawan oza Cc: "gdb@sourceware.org" Sent: Sun, October 24, 2010 1:32:14 AM Subject: Re: ChangeLog info missing ? Michael Snyder wrote: > paawan oza wrote: >> Hi Michael, >> >> I have downloaded gdb 7.2 to continue working on reversible debugging. As I >>have observed the ChangeLog, there are 2 things. >> >> 1) below flaoting point changelog is missing from ChangeLog of gdb >> >> --- gdb.orig/ChangeLog 2009-08-21 21:37:18.000000000 -0400 >> +++ gdb.new/floating.ChangeLog 2009-08-21 21:37:13.000000000 -0400 >> @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ >> +2009-08-21 Oza Pawandeep >> + >> + * i386-tdep.c: Support for floating point recording. >> + Records and Replay the i386 floating point registers, >> + of i387 FPU. >> + >> 2009-08-19 Ralf Wildenhues >> * configure.ac: Call AC_DISABLE_OPTION_CHECKING. >> >> >> 2) there has been work done on arm-tdep.c as I see ChangeLog (as I was also >>paralelly working, but I was not sure about already work going on) >> The progress was slow because I changed organisation : ( >> >> I am not sure how much work has been done on arm and what is left.. >> >> kindly clarify my understanding on point 1 and possibly on point 2. > > Hello Oza, > > If your changelog entry was left out, I appologize. It was probably > my fault -- I'll fix it when I get back from the gcc summit next week. > > As for point #2, I'm sure some work has taken place in ther arm-tdep.c > module, but as far as I am aware, nothing related to reverse debugging > has been checked in there. I do recall reading a message or two from > somebody else (not a regular contributer) who expressed an interest in > implementing reverse debugging for arm, but so far he has not submitted > any for review. > > Good to hear from you, and sorry again if your changelog entry got left out. > > Michael > Hello Oza, Your changelog entry did not get left out. You can find it in src/gdb/ChangeLog-2009. You may not have realized that we start a new ChangeLog file at the beginning of each year. Cheers, Michael