From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18766 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2003 04:28:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18758 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2003 04:28:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gandalf.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.22) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Mar 2003 04:28:42 -0000 Received: from zaretsky ([80.230.234.142]) by gandalf.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.2.2-GA) with ESMTP id AJW83312; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 06:28:27 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 04:28:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: drow@mvista.com Message-Id: <9003-Wed26Mar2003062206+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: ac131313@redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20030326003536.GA14672@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Tue, 25 Mar 2003 19:35:36 -0500) Subject: Re: GDB's breakpoint internals Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <3E80F4DF.4090809@redhat.com> <20030326003536.GA14672@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00354.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 19:35:36 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > > > I might be mistaken, but I don't think GDB implemented things this way. > > Instead, it has a single tangled table. > > Yes. If someone volunteers to do something about it... ...or at least to document how it's done now...