From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25620 invoked by alias); 18 Jul 2004 18:44:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25613 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2004 18:44:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO aragorn.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.23) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 18 Jul 2004 18:44:11 -0000 Received: from zaretski (pns03-195-136.inter.net.il [80.230.195.136]) by aragorn.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.6-GR) with ESMTP id DUV46249; Sun, 18 Jul 2004 21:43:34 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 19:03:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Daniel Jacobowitz Message-Id: <9003-Sun18Jul2004214239+0300-eliz@gnu.org> CC: mec.gnu@mindspring.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com, rolandz@poczta.fm In-reply-to: <20040718050420.GA13745@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Sun, 18 Jul 2004 01:04:20 -0400) Subject: Re: How to setup a breakpoint on constructor Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20040717205225.56BC04B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> <9003-Sun18Jul2004071107+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <20040718050420.GA13745@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg00232.txt.bz2 > Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 01:04:20 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > > > Can't we put a breakpoint on all instances in that case as well? > > Yes. But this requires a certain amount of user interface design and > implementation hackery that no one has done Sorry, I must be missing something: if we put the breakpoint on all the instances of the constructor's code, and do that without asking the user anything, what UI aspects need to be figured out and designed?