From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28443 invoked by alias); 4 Jul 2004 19:20:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28436 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2004 19:20:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO aragorn.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.23) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 4 Jul 2004 19:20:38 -0000 Received: from zaretski (pns03-209-245.inter.net.il [80.230.209.245]) by aragorn.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.6-GR) with ESMTP id DOR54636; Sun, 4 Jul 2004 22:19:52 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 19:20:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Daniel Jacobowitz Message-Id: <9003-Sun04Jul2004222000+0300-eliz@gnu.org> CC: jimb@redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20040704061351.GA25802@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Sun, 4 Jul 2004 02:13:51 -0400) Subject: Re: Delay the branch for E500 native support Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20040702224047.GA21295@nevyn.them.org> <7137-Sat03Jul2004122237+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <20040704061351.GA25802@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg00027.txt.bz2 > Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2004 02:13:51 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > We've chosen to release GDB according to a schedule, or at least to > make an effort in that direction. I think it's a reasonable choice, > but if you don't agree then we can discuss that. But pushing dates > back for one feature at a time is not a good way to finish anything; > either we're trying for a date or we aren't. Perhaps it wasn't clear, but all I was trying to say was that I think Jim's request is reasonable.