From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
To: ac131313@cygnus.com
Cc: jimb@cygnus.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: GDB's texi to html conversion; Was: [Jim Blandy <jimb@cygnus.com>] RFA: Don't pass -glossary flag to texi2html
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 23:51:00 -0000
Message-id: <9003-Sat20Oct2001085052+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
References: <npbsjedkou.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com> <3405-Fri12Oct2001001736+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <3BC61DEC.1080902@cygnus.com> <nphet5d83m.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com> <5567-Fri12Oct2001083936+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <3BC71C63.8010401@cygnus.com> <968-Fri12Oct2001192329+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <3BD0B666.8070207@cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-10/msg00206.html

> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 19:25:26 -0400
> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
> > 
> > Obviously, it's your call.  IMHO the generation of HTML is not
> > terribly important because I expect it to be used almost exclusively
> > for the GDB Web page.  It's not really a user-level feature, it's a
> > maintainer's feature.  If that's true, using a non-released version
> > shouldn't harm anyone but you  [;-)] 
> 
> When it comes down to it, I probably shouldn't care - the most important 
> thing is good web pages.  Where can I get this magic texinfo?

Here:

  ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo-4.0c.tar.gz