From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15668 invoked by alias); 14 Aug 2004 10:40:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15653 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2004 10:40:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO aragorn.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.23) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 14 Aug 2004 10:40:21 -0000 Received: from zaretski (pns03-200-69.inter.net.il [80.230.200.69]) by aragorn.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.6-GR) with ESMTP id EEY65615; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 13:39:35 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 10:40:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Mark Kettenis Message-Id: <9003-Sat14Aug2004133634+0300-eliz@gnu.org> CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <200408132202.i7DM1x5k012167@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> (message from Mark Kettenis on Sat, 14 Aug 2004 00:02:00 +0200 (CEST)) Subject: Re: Preprocessor symbol style Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200408132202.i7DM1x5k012167@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00211.txt.bz2 > Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 00:02:00 +0200 (CEST) > From: Mark Kettenis > > #ifdef HAVE_FOO_H > # include > #else > # ifdef HAVE_BAR_H > # include > # ifndef HAVE_FOOBAR > # define FOOBAR FOO(BAR) > # endif > # endif > #endif > > This makes it much easier to see how the #if's and #endif's balance. > > Can we please adopt the second style for GDB? I agree that the second style is more readable.