From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18178 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2004 11:54:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18149 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2004 11:54:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Jan 2004 11:54:41 -0000 Received: from zaretski (pns03-194-224.inter.net.il [80.230.194.224]) by legolas.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.8-GR) with ESMTP id BBV99746; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 13:54:03 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 11:54:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Daniel Jacobowitz Message-Id: <9003-Sat10Jan2004135059+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: cagney@gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20040109143618.GA32690@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:36:18 -0500) Subject: Re: GCC 3.4 vs GDB 6.1 Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <3FFDBE02.2030609@gnu.org> <6654-Fri09Jan2004105457+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> <20040109143618.GA32690@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00135.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:36:18 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2003-12/msg00271.html > > > > Does it sound like a GCC bug? > > No idea without more information. Did you ever get dwarfdump to work > on COFF? dwarfdump has no hope of ever running on a platform that doesn't support ELF, at least as an option, since dwarfdump needs libelf to be built. I still have plans to build it on GNU/Linux and try to use it against the binary that gave me trouble on that box; I don't know if it will be of any use, though. Are you saying that this problem never happened on an ELF platform, like on GNU/Linux?