From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30977 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2006 23:09:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 30968 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Mar 2006 23:09:19 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (HELO xproxy.gmail.com) (66.249.82.197) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 23:09:18 +0000 Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s7so215551wxc for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:09:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.28.2 with SMTP id b2mr1681903wxb; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:09:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.126.10 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:09:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8f2776cb0603221509q4b4c173ftc6e4a0eb40731c42@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 01:41:00 -0000 From: "Jim Blandy" To: "Andrew Cagney" Subject: Re: Changing my address in the GNATS database Cc: "Jim Blandy" , gdb@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <4421D518.7000204@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <8f2776cb0603220839m222391c8s1939503c0d527f5b@mail.gmail.com> <4421C974.1080706@redhat.com> <8f2776cb0603221421m1daeb9bbi6ce6a0be2750bddf@mail.gmail.com> <4421D518.7000204@redhat.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg00161.txt.bz2 On 3/22/06, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Since you feel strongly that we should be focusing on just your specific > occurance of this problem, then, sure (there are a number of other > people in an identical situtation, I guess we can re visit them later). I hadn't anticipated the policy discussions, but that aside, I feel that the benefit to me is worth the effort required. > I believe that the e-mail address you want to consider though is > jimb@sourceware.org. At least that is what has been used for all recent > gnats additions, and means that in the future only one address (the > .forward) will need to be updated. That's fine with me. Are there any further objections?