From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2637 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2006 07:49:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 2628 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Feb 2006 07:49:47 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (HELO zproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.162.196) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 07:49:47 +0000 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z3so800795nzf for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:49:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.68.3 with SMTP id q3mr1531409nza; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:49:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.2.63 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:49:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8f2776cb0602112349y6d7387b3v76df00d9505fc2fd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 07:49:00 -0000 From: Jim Blandy To: Mark Kettenis Subject: Re: MI error messages Cc: eliz@gnu.org, ghost@cs.msu.su, gdb@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <200602102034.k1AKYtI4023423@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060210134700.GA21328@nevyn.them.org> <200602102034.k1AKYtI4023423@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00116.txt.bz2 On 2/10/06, Mark Kettenis wrote: > The only way we can ever be consistent is by removing them. Function > names are an implementation detail. What if we reorganize the code a > bit, changing the function name. Should we change the error message? > Or leave it as is, such that it no longer refers to the function that > actually prints that message? I think this is right. These GDB function names have no place in a protoco= l.