Re: Fwd: -Wpointer-sign for GCC 4.1

Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-18T23:19:52Z

On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 11:24:09PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Let's forget about them. The mostly bogus signed vs. unsigned char
> ones dominate the useful warnings for the other integers.
>
> Is there any reason not to commit my -Werror patch now (with the
> -Wno-pointer-sign)?

It's fine with me, but I'd like to make sure Jim agrees first; I'm not
sure if he's said or not.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery