From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30797 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2005 06:21:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 30790 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Nov 2005 06:21:58 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (HELO zproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.162.196) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 06:21:55 +0000 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x3so1590170nzd for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 22:21:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.227.10 with SMTP id z10mr139782nzg; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 22:21:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.2.35 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 22:21:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8f2776cb0511232221v6b54dee4i22d7dbb1f587b4bf@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:21:00 -0000 From: Jim Blandy To: Ulrich Weigand Subject: Re: Prologue analysis interface Cc: Joel Brobecker , gdb@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <200511231454.jANEsNGs015176@53v30g15.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <8f2776cb0511221914h7858170cp6bd2d66382d4ec1f@mail.gmail.com> <200511231454.jANEsNGs015176@53v30g15.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00541.txt.bz2 On 11/23/05, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Just one comment on this: the CFA is not necessarily the original SP > (on s390 we have a constant offset). We'd have to leave it to platform > code to actually determine the CFA itself. Why does your CFA need to be an offset from the original SP? Aside from some more code needing to add an offset itself, what would break?