From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17472 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2005 05:48:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 17459 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Nov 2005 05:48:16 -0000 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (HELO zproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.162.198) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 05:48:16 +0000 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x3so351727nzd for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 21:48:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.20.16 with SMTP id 16mr578260nzt; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 21:48:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.2.35 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 21:48:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8f2776cb0511182148u78181643o940ebd454d0e3901@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 05:48:00 -0000 From: Jim Blandy To: Michael Snyder Subject: Packing "R" actions in a QTDP packet Cc: gdb@sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00419.txt.bz2 The code in stringify_collection_list will concatenate as many 'M' and 'X' actions as it can in a packet, but it leaves 'R' actions in a packet by themselves. Is there any technical reason for this? Should I simply document the protocol as allowing actions to be packed together as much as you like as long as the overall packet size doesn't get too big, or should I say that 'R' actions require a packet unto themselves?