From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12643 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2009 18:20:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 12635 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Sep 2009 18:20:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.33.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:20:16 +0000 Received: from spaceape23.eur.corp.google.com (spaceape23.eur.corp.google.com [172.28.16.75]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n8EIKCnq010254 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:20:13 +0100 Received: from yxe33 (yxe33.prod.google.com [10.190.2.33]) by spaceape23.eur.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n8EIJtaE014982 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:20:07 -0700 Received: by yxe33 with SMTP id 33so6558211yxe.0 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:20:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.213.5 with SMTP id p5mr6561695anq.1.1252952406950; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:20:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090914175244.GH7363@adacore.com> References: <20090902164425.GR4379@adacore.com> <8ac60eac0909030854j21d514f9h5047a099a3eb3d80@mail.gmail.com> <8ac60eac0909040825u25ce064co34550210ec2e5f11@mail.gmail.com> <8ac60eac0909141043s50a2311dh8fa2bc5810bb824@mail.gmail.com> <20090914175244.GH7363@adacore.com> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:20:00 -0000 Message-ID: <8ac60eac0909141120l256166aam2c4681640fd0bdb1@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gdb-7.0 release] 2009-09-02 status and proposed plan From: Paul Pluzhnikov To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, Tom Tromey , Doug Evans Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00190.txt.bz2 On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote: > I propose we do NOT block the branch creation pending resolution, but > rather make this release-blocking. We can fix this issue on the branch. > Otherwise, we'll keep finding problems, and will never create that > branch. That sounds good to me. -- Paul Pluzhnikov