From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3479 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2009 18:47:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 3466 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Aug 2009 18:47:23 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.33.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 18:47:15 +0000 Received: from wpaz13.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz13.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.77]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n74IlB2X022657 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 19:47:12 +0100 Received: from qyk38 (qyk38.prod.google.com [10.241.83.166]) by wpaz13.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n74Il40E016461 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 11:47:04 -0700 Received: by qyk38 with SMTP id 38so5081303qyk.25 for ; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 11:47:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.96.15 with SMTP id f15mr2123290qcn.91.1249411624230; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 11:47:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090804184000.GA14873@caradoc.them.org> References: <20090728154001.GA19451@caradoc.them.org> <8ac60eac0907291656v13f568ebw4f3a2b9bb7c7223d@mail.gmail.com> <8ac60eac0908031749y59867374wa451d2f504483390@mail.gmail.com> <20090804145318.GA31664@caradoc.them.org> <8ac60eac0908041037q46b447d9n7b539ab53d7ce1ea@mail.gmail.com> <20090804184000.GA14873@caradoc.them.org> Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 18:47:00 -0000 Message-ID: <8ac60eac0908041147m17f3f337g3ea15696dc0a3170@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Solibs and objfile BFD ownership From: Paul Pluzhnikov To: Paul Pluzhnikov , tromey@redhat.com, gdb@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00020.txt.bz2 On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: >> Daniel, could you confirm that this fixes the ARM failures? > Yes - looks much better with this patch! So committed. Thanks, -- Paul Pluzhnikov