From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30625 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2009 18:54:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 30616 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jun 2009 18:54:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.45.13) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:53:59 +0000 Received: from spaceape13.eur.corp.google.com (spaceape13.eur.corp.google.com [172.28.16.147]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n5QIrtrR017249 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:53:56 -0700 Received: from qyk11 (qyk11.prod.google.com [10.241.83.139]) by spaceape13.eur.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n5QIrejR011195 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:53:53 -0700 Received: by qyk11 with SMTP id 11so2565692qyk.5 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:53:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.86.149 with SMTP id s21mr1150362qcl.25.1246042433021; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:53:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A451826.3010709@vmware.com> References: <8763ekb9ql.fsf@sphinx.net.ru> <8ac60eac0906250853y3f70e3b1y2bf97674b1e83d7b@mail.gmail.com> <200906260838.31341.andre.poenitz@nokia.com> <8ac60eac0906260004t4b78c1ffv47eedd2ecb4662f4@mail.gmail.com> <8ac60eac0906261035g7ad07e7fx6af9af503775b6f8@mail.gmail.com> <4A451826.3010709@vmware.com> Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:54:00 -0000 Message-ID: <8ac60eac0906261153g47c1bec6r18530c2fafc86cc6@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Learn function name by its address From: Paul Pluzhnikov To: Michael Snyder Cc: "tromey@redhat.com" , =?ISO-8859-1?B?QW5kcukgUPZuaXR6?= , "gdb@sourceware.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00257.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Michael Snyder wrote: > What about just commenting them out, so that the work isn't lost > and someone may some day implement them? > > Same for the docs -- can they be left in the source and just commented out? That sounds reasonable. I'll send a patch in a bit :-) -- Paul Pluzhnikov