From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29537 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2009 17:35:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 29528 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jun 2009 17:35:34 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.33.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:35:28 +0000 Received: from spaceape24.eur.corp.google.com (spaceape24.eur.corp.google.com [172.28.16.76]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n5QHZPM0010515 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:35:25 +0100 Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qwd5.prod.google.com [10.241.193.197]) by spaceape24.eur.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n5QHZM9w011504 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:35:22 -0700 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so880352qwd.45 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:35:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.86.149 with SMTP id s21mr1139171qcl.25.1246037722153; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:35:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8763ekb9ql.fsf@sphinx.net.ru> <8ac60eac0906250853y3f70e3b1y2bf97674b1e83d7b@mail.gmail.com> <200906260838.31341.andre.poenitz@nokia.com> <8ac60eac0906260004t4b78c1ffv47eedd2ecb4662f4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:35:00 -0000 Message-ID: <8ac60eac0906261035g7ad07e7fx6af9af503775b6f8@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Learn function name by its address From: Paul Pluzhnikov To: tromey@redhat.com Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?B?QW5kcukgUPZuaXR6?= , gdb@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00253.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Tom Tromey wrote: > If you have a list ready, would you mind writing a patch to remove > them from the documentation? As Nick Roberts said earlier in the thread, these can be identified by Example ... N.A. marker. I just didn't know what that meant. I think removing them would be incorrect: they do exist, MI accepts them, they just don't work :-( Perhaps add a "NOTE: This command has not yet been implemented" to each one? -- Paul Pluzhnikov