From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23023 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2009 07:05:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 23013 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jun 2009 07:05:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.33.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 07:05:04 +0000 Received: from wpaz37.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz37.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.101]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n5Q750YJ029023 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 08:05:00 +0100 Received: from qyk35 (qyk35.prod.google.com [10.241.83.163]) by wpaz37.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n5Q74QOa011424 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:04:58 -0700 Received: by qyk35 with SMTP id 35so2767916qyk.26 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:04:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.88.134 with SMTP id a6mr989370qcm.89.1245999897683; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:04:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200906260838.31341.andre.poenitz@nokia.com> References: <8763ekb9ql.fsf@sphinx.net.ru> <8ac60eac0906250853y3f70e3b1y2bf97674b1e83d7b@mail.gmail.com> <200906260838.31341.andre.poenitz@nokia.com> Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 07:05:00 -0000 Message-ID: <8ac60eac0906260004t4b78c1ffv47eedd2ecb4662f4@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Learn function name by its address From: Paul Pluzhnikov To: =?ISO-8859-1?B?QW5kcukgUPZuaXR6?= Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00246.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Andr=E9 P=F6nitz= wrote: > Looks like the wonders of MI's wishful thinking strike again: > -symbol-info-symbol 0x805c72d > ^error,msg=3D"Undefined mi command: symbol-info-symbol (missing implement= ation)" Indeed. I am puzzled: what's the point of ducumenting un-implemented MI commands? Looks like there is a whole lot of them :-( --=20 Paul Pluzhnikov