From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11363 invoked by alias); 6 Jun 2009 14:55:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 11351 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jun 2009 14:55:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.45.13) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Jun 2009 14:55:26 +0000 Received: from wpaz1.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz1.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.65]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n56EtNBL020407 for ; Sat, 6 Jun 2009 07:55:24 -0700 Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com (qwc5.prod.google.com [10.241.193.133]) by wpaz1.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n56EtMZ6006581 for ; Sat, 6 Jun 2009 07:55:22 -0700 Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 5so1154852qwc.48 for ; Sat, 06 Jun 2009 07:55:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.74.71 with SMTP id t7mr1096579qcj.67.1244300122344; Sat, 06 Jun 2009 07:55:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <23901800.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <23901800.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 14:55:00 -0000 Message-ID: <8ac60eac0906060755g456d4502yc0242a4c2ff926ca@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: gdb exits with segmentation fault From: Paul Pluzhnikov To: nitinvk04 Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00063.txt.bz2 On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 6:16 AM, nitinvk04 wrote: > I am using Mandrake 10 with a kernel 2.6.3-7mdk. and the gdb > is 6.0 - quite old, but i have some requirement. It is quite unlikely that anyone will look at why GDB 6.0 crashes for you, and you haven't explained why you need such an old GDB ("I have some requirement" doesn't explain anything to me). Why don't you compile GDB from current CVS Head instead? Cheers, -- Paul Pluzhnikov