From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23643 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2009 16:30:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 23620 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Apr 2009 16:30:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.33.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:30:25 +0000 Received: from wpaz29.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz29.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.93]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n3UGUL13015227 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:30:22 +0100 Received: from qyk27 (qyk27.prod.google.com [10.241.83.155]) by wpaz29.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n3UGSkhK026944 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:30:20 -0700 Received: by qyk27 with SMTP id 27so3381315qyk.2 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:30:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.82.15 with SMTP id z15mr1449865qck.32.1241109019844; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:30:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <49F9CF1D.8000209@apogeect.com> References: <49F4C98B.2000609@apogeect.com> <49F9BB0E.4010706@apogeect.com> <8ac60eac0904300841t1647155ar46c6337cfa5eece8@mail.gmail.com> <49F9CF1D.8000209@apogeect.com> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <8ac60eac0904300930p2c95ab07ud2fd4c58b4c79b40@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Experiences building and using gdb 6.8 on Solaris From: Paul Pluzhnikov To: Frank Middleton Cc: Hui Zhu , gdb@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00234.txt.bz2 On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Frank Middleton wrote: > On 04/30/09 11:41, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote: >> Does attached patch fix it for you? > > Yes, it appears that it does. Thank you so much! What should I tell > the OpenSolaris folks? Probably nothing: this looks like unwarranted assumption on GDB part. I'll submit this patch to gdb-patches@sourceware.org for review, and will CC you so you'll know whether this is the right fix. Cheers, -- Paul Pluzhnikov