From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23749 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2009 00:35:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 23740 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Apr 2009 00:35:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.45.13) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:35:42 +0000 Received: from zps77.corp.google.com (zps77.corp.google.com [172.25.146.77]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n3U0Ytfm025659 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:34:55 -0700 Received: from qyk8 (qyk8.prod.google.com [10.241.83.136]) by zps77.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n3U0YL6E017165 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:34:54 -0700 Received: by qyk8 with SMTP id 8so3771123qyk.5 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:34:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.84.209 with SMTP id k17mr992256qcl.61.1241051693702; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:34:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <49F8ECE5.6020502@apogeect.com> References: <49F4C98B.2000609@apogeect.com> <8ac60eac0904261743i452a3ae5qc49b8f483644413a@mail.gmail.com> <49F5B0BB.4030406@apogeect.com> <8ac60eac0904291102l52e0f9d1i26714b05a0e93d9e@mail.gmail.com> <49F8ECE5.6020502@apogeect.com> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 05:44:00 -0000 Message-ID: <8ac60eac0904291734u1a2fdcbbn238a461f26244a24@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Experiences building and using gdb 6.8 on Solaris From: Paul Pluzhnikov To: Frank Middleton Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00226.txt.bz2 On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Frank Middleton wrote: >> I am not sure there *are* any Solaris maintainers. > > From my perspective, this is a regression from Solaris 9, where gdb > (6.0) didn't have this problem with libXau. gdb 6.0 and later do, > probably as of Solaris 10. I really meant Solaris libXau maintainers, Oh, I meant "GDB maintainers for Solaris". Sorry for the confusion. > OK, no problem; I will save the offending libXau somewhere. It obviously > won't be (isn't) fixed in snv112 but I'll save this one as baseline anyway. What does 'readelf -S libXau.so.6' say? Looking at the GDB source, I think the problem may be triggered if there is 'Ddata.data' section, but no '.data' section. Thanks, -- Paul Pluzhnikov