From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id iEOoJAgQ3mU1QS8AWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 11:38:32 -0500 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=DgpwwOZH; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 87EDD1E0D2; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 11:38:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C5EB1E030 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 11:38:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E14783858C24 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 16:38:29 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E14783858C24 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1709051909; bh=y/4SklibylM3rLk+4WXCJMBWPt3VDDxhQ8w1NkngiSk=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=DgpwwOZHgQ4qsZGM6aEyBpUyvRjjjW2SG28df0Tpqp804y+/o7rLHVuCJgOJs2cF5 QwTpFqY5PD6rbmYvVmcwlidWmATnhWHZ/6jR0ZvEWIbK1dzVmss2FwVonIdMblA+0r hb4K3fwKdZ+brsVd5a3mbIz+tEJYs7T6AZRGanRI= Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ACF03858D20 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 16:37:49 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 5ACF03858D20 ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 5ACF03858D20 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1709051871; cv=none; b=Upj2qaW6rZCugbAvLzQbcBs88OxFvmr5Zc/1Z32W8xF8FKF7XO3Jblcr2nYP6sdIdp2nBQ0s09cmTfXeKL84jyXkDBddvIKz61h43nau5t9IJk0JngKs3gAwBkpmEH7ntCHDqJoXAhb8CJYcwWqqMr0z1T/3qzuWfzJErRaUdyk= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1709051871; c=relaxed/simple; bh=y/4SklibylM3rLk+4WXCJMBWPt3VDDxhQ8w1NkngiSk=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=ebX6RV2ATC4aDdM2rRtdHf85NAIt+OLsVKQp8B2HT/YiXLIZtdJu5M49liFXZYggypr92ZbxafsTc7aK5GePF/G1gNNuMH4PoeWtB5UHSCbknbiS6UU9iOOec+NIwFNFKt6lNyyzl3MuwRc2thTOL7PJadeZX20DyZEWXRTeMT4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from [172.16.0.106] (192-222-143-198.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.143.198]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5BD401E030; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 11:37:48 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <892bee4f-5d11-4e5b-b3d4-3f079f7bee43@simark.ca> Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 11:37:47 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: gdb and ancient GNU autotools Content-Language: fr To: =?UTF-8?Q?Tomasz_K=C5=82oczko?= , Sam James Cc: gdb@sourceware.org References: <87v86d6byg.fsf@gentoo.org> <87o7c56ale.fsf@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Marchi via Gdb Reply-To: Simon Marchi Errors-To: gdb-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" On 2/24/24 13:30, Tomasz Kłoczko via Gdb wrote: > Going back to the subject: someone at least started thinking about starting > doing something to move away from those ancient GNU autotools versions > (probably kicking a few as*ess on integrating properly some > libtool changes) or move to meson/cmake? Good news, I found a concrete of a problem that would be fixed by moving to a newer autoconf: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31417#c1 You can start working on patches to bump the autoconf/automake versions, I can help with the review. Simon