From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4499 invoked by alias); 14 Mar 2014 18:08:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 4475 invoked by uid 89); 14 Mar 2014 18:08:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 18:08:06 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s2EI837p024498 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 14 Mar 2014 14:08:03 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-169.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.169]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s2EI82Th025086 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 14 Mar 2014 14:08:02 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: =?utf-8?Q?Jo=C3=ABl_Kr=C3=A4hemann?= Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: gdb function signature differs from declaration References: <1394799086.4203.8.camel@debian> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 18:08:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1394799086.4203.8.camel@debian> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Jo=C3=ABl_Kr?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A4hemann=22's?= message of "Fri, 14 Mar 2014 13:11:26 +0100") Message-ID: <87zjksirge.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg00047.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jo=C3=ABl" =3D=3D Jo=C3=ABl Kr=C3=A4hemann wri= tes: Jo=C3=ABl> The last stack entry #0 is missing a parameter what could cause = this? My first suspects would be either that the program is out of date with respect to the source, or that the debuginfo generated by the compiler is incorrect. You can check the latter, perhaps with some difficulty (sorry), using readelf -wi and searching for the function in question. Tom