From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9313 invoked by alias); 21 May 2013 16:42:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 9252 invoked by uid 89); 21 May 2013 16:42:46 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 May 2013 16:42:45 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4LGgeOl019469 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 21 May 2013 12:42:40 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-72.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.72]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r4LGgcSE004154 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 21 May 2013 12:42:39 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Kifa The Great Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Method call and calling convention References: Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 16:42:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Kifa The Great's message of "Sat, 18 May 2013 16:05:09 +0400") Message-ID: <87y5b8jncx.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-05/txt/msg00095.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Kifa" == Kifa The Great writes: Kifa> Windows x86 targets are using the __thiscall calling Kifa> convention for C++ class-member functions by default from GCC 4.7. Kifa> Could you please tell me if this is a bug, feature or maybe I do Kifa> something wrong? It looks like a bug to me. I have two suggestions -- Kifa> GNU gdb (GDB) 7.5.1-ubuntu First, try a newer gdb. Maybe the problem was already fixed. Second, if that fails, please file a bug report in Bugzilla. Tom