From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31234 invoked by alias); 9 Aug 2013 18:23:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 31015 invoked by uid 89); 9 Aug 2013 18:23:26 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from Unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 18:23:25 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r79ING1a027880 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 9 Aug 2013 14:23:17 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-157.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.157]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r79INF8O020160 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 9 Aug 2013 14:23:15 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: Jan Kratochvil , Shang Yu , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: user friendly symbol name References: <20130809102225.GA11181@host2.jankratochvil.net> <5204F953.4070904@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 18:23:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <5204F953.4070904@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Fri, 09 Aug 2013 15:14:43 +0100") Message-ID: <87y58au3jh.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg00052.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> On 08/09/2013 11:22 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: >> (gdb) maintenance demangle _ZNSt16nested_exceptionD2Ev >> std::nested_exception::~nested_exception() Pedro> Interesting. It seems a pity this is a maintenance Pedro> command. Shouldn't we "upgrade" it to a regular user command? Yeah, though the command as currently formulated is a bit of a pain. At least, I usually forget to "set lang c++" first and then have to go back. Similarly, sometimes it would be nice to be able to specify the language as an argument. Tom