From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19772 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2013 17:09:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 19753 invoked by uid 89); 21 Oct 2013 17:09:51 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:09:51 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r9LH9mvW012822 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:09:48 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-54.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.54]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r9LH9le4031121 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:09:48 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Expanding macros in breakpoint conditions References: <83vc0qk1jx.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:09:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <83vc0qk1jx.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 21 Oct 2013 19:53:54 +0300") Message-ID: <87y55mk0tg.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-10/txt/msg00070.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii writes: Eli> So my question is: is GDB supposed to expand macros in breakpoint Eli> conditions? Yes, it should work under the conditions you describe -- namely when the macro information is available. I don't think there are any known macro expansion bugs here, either. Tom