From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 66875 invoked by alias); 23 Jun 2015 01:44:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 66863 invoked by uid 89); 23 Jun 2015 01:44:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 01:44:46 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6948D3582CD; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 01:44:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unused-10-15-17-126.yyz.redhat.com [10.15.17.126]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t5N1ihAT005336 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA256 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 22 Jun 2015 21:44:44 -0400 From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: David Edelsohn Cc: Doug Evans , "gdb\@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [BuildBot] News and announcements References: <87r3p3o97k.fsf@redhat.com> <878ubbo74z.fsf@redhat.com> <878ubbjk7u.fsf@redhat.com> X-URL: http://blog.sergiodj.net Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 01:44:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (David Edelsohn's message of "Mon, 22 Jun 2015 21:32:27 -0400") Message-ID: <87y4jbi4fw.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg00056.txt.bz2 On Monday, June 22 2015, David Edelsohn wrote: >> After dealing with some minor issues, I'm now seeing this: >> >> >> >> I talked to Bergner, who checked this patch in, and he said he doesn't >> know why this is happing. I'm also not really interested (and most >> importantly, don't have the time) in maintaining the AIX builder(s), so >> if you could take a look at this I'd appreciate. >> >> As a side note, and since you are the interested part in this AIX >> buildslave, I was wondering if you want to be the responsible for it. > > I restarted the buildslave with /opt/freeware/bin in your path, as we > had discussed earlier. As you can see in the link above, the buildslave already has /opt/freeware/bin in the PATH, therefore everything was already covered in this area before. But thanks for this. > We saw a similar error building GCC a few months ago after the CHKP > patches. This means that GDB now has a debug statement that is more > than 64K in length. More recent versions of GCC allow debug > continuation lines, but this really means that m32c has a ridiculously > large enum. It's also bloating the rest of the GDB object files, even > if DWARF can handle the length. Right. Strangely I wasn't seeing this problem when compiling GDB manually in the machine, and Peter's commit doesn't touch the m32c file. > Yes, I can run the buildslave, if you want. That would be awesome! It is currently running in my homedir at gcc111, but I can stop it so that you can configure the buildslave at your homedir if you want. I'd prefer to keep the same name (aix-power7-1). I can also send you (in private) the password for the buildslave, along with the full command to create it. Let me know when/what you need and I'll be happy to help. Thanks, -- Sergio GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36 Please send encrypted e-mail if possible http://sergiodj.net/