From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9088 invoked by alias); 29 Oct 2013 19:07:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 9078 invoked by uid 89); 29 Oct 2013 19:07:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:07:05 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r9TJ72uC010830 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:07:02 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-94.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.94]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r9TJ70e8019669 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:07:01 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Krister Olofsson Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: gdb and variadic functions References: <526FCDDB.9090707@gmail.com> <87vc0g8670.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <526FD14D.6090101@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:07:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <526FD14D.6090101@gmail.com> (Krister Olofsson's message of "Tue, 29 Oct 2013 16:16:29 +0100") Message-ID: <87wqkv7v6z.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-10/txt/msg00183.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Krister" == Krister Olofsson writes: Krister> yes I know that the versions is very old but it's the latest released Krister> for FreeBSD/ARM that I can find. Porting a new version could take some Krister> time... Yeah. I can appreciate that. I don't know what else to suggest though. You could try to find the bug fix to backport it; but since so much time has elapsed it would probably be just as easy to debug it anew. Tom