From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id WFSdKuGL22hSehkAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 03:50:57 -0400 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=pL6Rk7O5; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 9DE871E0B6; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 03:50:57 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D2DB1E047 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 03:50:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC1A8385AC3C for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 07:50:50 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AC1A8385AC3C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1759218650; bh=psHM6UMYaFp6WzLW4PfyZjfs+RWs2EJA6KEMbGdFF5k=; h=To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=pL6Rk7O5V/FTFs/r/5Z1Mr1xTArnmohYNJSK9LsFtF+XfFazR2xt/9Yxm5rrhZW2Z Erag6qf+VVKj0r1MhQaeFkOS7p6vJVLLmGl/0xr34DmLqRaFM4O/53ppP88aWXPIXl KKyd3tzhyt/VGBSy3KbhYpbHdcSU66TR+jEpGMvo= Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CBF33858D20; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 07:50:04 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 2CBF33858D20 ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 2CBF33858D20 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1759218604; cv=none; b=mQJaSta2CSNEAp/vtMM6k6XrHiXrlbuEdlc65+Iv6L1Y+ZiqoIkP4vQ09BFFIxXu3uRMtU4O+a1Fb/uErxlV34O1GZwkiuCsrS3hYkWI4SoaQmU7VcB/dMmn+JLcDLsyxqn55B9x1aST/HY284RQRYnfqqFWgnLCs/CizBHI2jw= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1759218604; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gw95duxOSyWlcwd9vcXQUI/Cz/DvMOX66ECEG811tM8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=Wf/OeCBXoJrT6aEYXfrXep8V1NaWg81q+YJK+avsbgKskREY2PD0i2akh7AvBU89S1gvLmyTry4Cb+UwiplOwzCTsHmYaVDYHq8XoJfg4zwa3noZbWIr+AXu3ypqkz85PSj6aZsm29b04jQdJDciu0GYPCJgcrdcp5+hFgGVWaY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2CBF33858D20 Received: from mop.sam.mop (2.8.3.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.a.5.c.d.c.d.9.1.0.b.8.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa [IPv6:2001:8b0:19dc:dc5a::382]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange secp256r1 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: sam) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D359F340EAD; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 07:49:59 +0000 (UTC) To: Andrew Pinski Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org, guinevere@redhat.com Subject: Re: bugzilla keyword for beginner issues to work on In-Reply-To: Organization: Gentoo References: User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.12; emacs 31.0.50 Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 08:49:56 +0100 Message-ID: <87wm5g2xcr.fsf@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Sam James via Gdb Reply-To: Sam James Errors-To: gdb-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" Andrew Pinski writes: > Hi all, > As talked about during the GNU tools cauldron, the gdb and gcc > keywords usage here are different but folks mentioned it would be a > good idea to have the same between the 2 bugzilla instances. Right now > gcc is easyhack while gdb uses good-first-bug. Both have issues with > the naming of each. 'good-first-*' is what people tend to search for in other projects. Having it aligned (and optimising for new contributors) makes sense, I think. > [...] sam