From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28699 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2014 21:44:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 28688 invoked by uid 89); 11 Feb 2014 21:43:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:43:59 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s1BLhwOJ015117 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:43:58 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-148.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.148]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s1BLhuNt014440 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:43:57 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Florian Weimer Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: How important is mcheck? References: <52F8F53C.8090708@redhat.com> <87d2itwpft.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <52FA95D9.2090500@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:44:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <52FA95D9.2090500@redhat.com> (Florian Weimer's message of "Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:27:53 +0100") Message-ID: <87vbwluxyb.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg00032.txt.bz2 Florian> I would make it completely unavailable. Ok, I see. If gdb is the only remaining user, then IMO don't let it stand in the way of progress, particularly given what Jan said. Tom