From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28603 invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2012 18:07:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 28593 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Dec 2012 18:07:29 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 18:07:21 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBEI7KMs012651 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 14 Dec 2012 13:07:20 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBEI7ICb021075 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 14 Dec 2012 13:07:19 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Tristan Gingold Cc: GDB Development Subject: Re: proposed symbol format deprecations References: <87zk1i3psj.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4C5C1CE6-64E0-4864-AB22-F5AF52E9E707@adacore.com> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 18:07:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4C5C1CE6-64E0-4864-AB22-F5AF52E9E707@adacore.com> (Tristan Gingold's message of "Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:37:33 +0100") Message-ID: <87txrozew9.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00058.txt.bz2 Tristan> [ bfd for HP/PA is able to be cross-built ] Thanks for the hint. Tristan> You should talk with the HP/PA GCC maintainer, as AFAIK only Tristan> gdb is able to debug gcc-generated binaries. He replied off-list to say that this is what he uses for all his GCC hacking. He's going to test some patches for me. I have a patch to make it possible to build somread.c anywhere the BFD target is enabled, so that's a start. So, consider this one dropped from the deprecation list. I'd still like to deprecate mdebugread.c though. Tom