From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31186 invoked by alias); 29 Sep 2002 22:25:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31112 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2002 22:25:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gash2.peakpeak.com) (207.174.178.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Sep 2002 22:25:53 -0000 Received: from fleche.redhat.com (mt11.peakpeak.com [206.168.3.155] (may be forged)) by gash2.peakpeak.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA12021; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 16:25:37 -0600 Received: by fleche.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 53CBC4F80A7; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 16:21:42 -0600 (MDT) To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: top level: make more dependencies explicit References: <20020929165232.GA27545@doctormoo.dyndns.org> <3D9733C2.2010405@redhat.com> <20020929172608.GA27678@doctormoo.dyndns.org> <3D973C44.6090601@redhat.com> <20020929174544.GA30373@doctormoo.dyndns.org> <3D974828.4050009@redhat.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com X-Attribution: Tom X-Zippy: What PROGRAM are they watching? Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:25:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <3D974828.4050009@redhat.com> Message-ID: <87smzs4etl.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00504.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Cagney writes: Andrew> What does the GNU coding standard have to say about the Andrew> release process? That `make dist' should make a distribution, and that it should ensure that non-source files in the distribution (e.g., yacc output, info files, etc), are up to date. The standards don't say anything about how this is to be implemented. It is perfectly reasonable to have the dist target run some random shell script (that is provided in the distribution). Tom